Tag Archives: election

When I worked for Hillary Clinton during the 2008 presidential primaries, our camp truly thought she would clinch the Democratic nomination, and go on to win the presidency to become our first female president. That didn’t work out, but we did elect our first black president. Great ordeal and I’m mighty proud of it.

South Korea just elected its first female president, surprisingly before we did. This feat is to be congratulated on its face. Park Geun-hye – whether or not people actually think of her as a woman – is indeed a woman. Many take issue with the fact that she is the daughter of former dictator (yes, not president, not strongman, but dictator, say it loud and clear) Park Jung-hee. I, too, take some issue with that fact, although not as extremely as others. Although the former dictator did arguably lay the groundwork for Korea’s exponential economic growth, he did so by maintaining his power using undemocratic and illegal means, to say the least. I hardheartedly disagree with the notion of focusing on the past and on a candidate’s lineage (which she had minimal control over) instead of focusing strictly on policy issues moving forward. However, this point, in my view, was overlooked to a great extent.

What I do take serious issue with is the way in which this election cycle was conducted. I will not (yet) use the term “rigged”. I will, however, discuss one of many fishy incidents that has already thrown this election into murky waters.

Let’s coin this incident as “The Online Crusaders”. The Cliffnotes version of the story is this. Saenuri, the ruling party of president-elect Park, allegedly hired a protestant pastor and a number of part-time workers, with the sole mission of “rigging” the social media arena. The pastor and his minions allegedly posted tweets and replies under fake aliases, intentionally (and allegedly falsely) accusing candidate Moon Jae-in of various wrongdoings. In addition, Korea’s National Intelligence Service (counterpart to our FBI) allegedly had an entire office dedicated to fabricating social media messages in favor of Park and against Moon. And what the hell was that about the NIS employee locking herself in her Gangnam condominium for days while she was suspected of participating in these acts? NIS agents, supposedly the cream of the crop of Korea’s intelligence community, allegedly hired to sit in front of computer monitors to tweet. Simply embarrassing.

I use the term “allegedly” for all of this, as none of it have been proven in a court of law. But as a lawyer who has looked over Korean election laws, the work of the Online Crusaders – both the pastor and his minions, and the NIS – is a clear violation of the law, if proven to be true.

I take issue with this because these alleged illegal acts were discovered and reported just days before the election, leaving no time to dive into the facts and fully inform the voting public. Whether or not that would have affected the outcome is another question, to which I would personally answer in the negative. Now it seems that the NIS, the police, and even the federal prosecutor’s office is on merry terms with the Saenuri party, forcing an even darker cloud over the prospects of a clean investigation into the cold, hard facts.

In all honesty, I could care less about who is elected as Korea’s next president. None of this affects me personally. And I must say that I am not, and never was, impressed with either candidate, and that I am not Park-bashing in any sense.

But I am pissed that the rule of law has, once again, fallen flat on its face in my home country. I am pissed that the majority of Koreans don’t seem to give a shit about the rule of law. I am pissed that we may never know what really happened during and after the election. I am pissed that regional feelings still dominate the political dialogue of my home country. I am pissed that, throughout the election cycle, the focus has been on finger-pointing and on the past, not educated debates on policy issues to bring about genuine change (don’t get me started on the presidential debates).

The election is over and Korea has a new president-elect. Whining and pissing about the outcome does no good, so I hope Korea finds a way to mend broken bonds and move forward, for God knows the country has a mountain of problems. It may take years, decades for true democratic values (like clean elections) to take root in Korea. It takes more than a system, more than oversight committees and government bureaucrats. It takes a democratic “mindset” that values fair dealing and ethical procedures. It takes a democratic “mindset” that values the well-being of others as much as one’s own. It takes a democratic “mindset” that values the courage to do what’s right.

Democracy is still young in Korea.

My Twitter account has eighteen followers. Anemic at best. I blame my rather lackluster response speed to social media in general. I also blame the lack of Twitter-crazy friends who’d follow me without arm-twisting threats to do so.

Bourdain has over one million followers.

The difference?

When I tweet about rumors regarding a possible bilateral investment treaty between Korea and the new government of Myanmar, eighteen people will see it pop up in their Home page. Of those eighteen, half never sign into their Twitter account. Of the remaining nine, half probably couldn’t care less about BITs.

When Bourdain tweets about his extraordinarily delicious dinner at Blue Ribbon Bakery, one million people see it. Of those one million, many are enthused, crazed Twitterians. Of those one million, many care about good food. Of those one million, many will flock to Blue Ribbon Bakery because Bourdain said so on Twitter.

That is influence.

I was never a true believer in Facebook, and hate it more after its flopped IPO (force-feeding me their “timeline” was a shove over the edge). I still doubt the value and purpose of other forms of social media, like Foursquare (seriously, we don’t care that you’ve checked into your office for the thirtieth time).

But Twitter is different. I gauge its value differently. It is the most efficient way to self-advertise one’s values and messages. Its true strength is in its ability to spread like wild fire. Retweets spread the message to an exponential number of followers, and the fire continues, as long as the wind is blowing. And hey, the iPhone app is east to use.

“Power Twitterians” can be influential vessels to spread any message. Particularly during an election year, politicians in both Korea and the U.S. are poised to lure in key influencers from all walks of life. A few tweets from a Power Twitterian will easily reach millions, and more importantly, people will actually listen. Because X said so, not the damn politician.

A new breed of influence, in the palm of your hand.

No surprise to see The New York Times, Reuters, and The Economist report this, as Ahn Cheol-soo’s formal announcement to run for the Korean presidency is indeed newsworthy. Here are five reasons why the U.S. should pay attention to this election cycle.

*     *     *

1. Ahn epitomizes a drastic paradigm shift in the Korean populous. He cries for the need for “horizontal leadership” in the presidency, one that will listen and heed to the needs of the people, and rule for the people as a whole. He is the prime example of the “T-Rex Squared” leader I wrote about in a post depicting a new leadership paradigm for the twenty-first century (read it here). The Korean people want their voices heard, and many now consider Ahn to be their vehicle of choice. But what is the current “voice” of the Korean people in regards to the U.S.? There are numerous sensitive political issues, the KORUS FTA, military outposts and command chains, and the Investor-State Dispute resolution process being a few. How Ahn conveys Korea’s position on such issues will be critical to Korea-U.S. relations in the coming years.

2. Ahn is a true “outsider”. He has never held political office, and he has never been directly involved in policy making. He is an ex-doctor, an ex-venture CEO, and now an ex-professor and college dean. His latest best-selling book, “Ahn Cheol-soo’s Thoughts”, and his rhetoric thus far is eerily similar to President Obama’s “Change” slogan of 2008. Indeed, Ahn’s central message is an overhaul in many critical arenas – politics, business, taxes, and so on. What’s different about Ahn, compared to Obama, is that Ahn is truly an outsider – he is not (yet) part of a major political party. Although winning a presidential election without the help of a party will be a daunting task, Ahn believes he only needs grassroots support of the people to win and bring genuine change.

3. Ahn will call for major changes within Korean big businesses and the “chaebol”s. The term “economic democratization” has been thrown around repeatedly thus far, its main purpose being tighter restrictions on business and demanding transparency in business processes. Similar to Obama’s rhetoric, and the Democratic Party platform, Ahn seems to reject the “trickle down” economic theory; instead, he emphasizes accountability in business and the government’s role in providing fair opportunities for the jobless. If Ahn is elected, the impact on business should be watched closely, as Korea an its companies are a major trading partner of the U.S.

4. Ahn is already calling for a revolutionized election process, and furthermore, Ahn strives to be a symbol of a transformed political process as a whole – transparent, fair, and more democratized with the incorporation of voters’ views. I find it interesting that the U.S. has not yet used its leverage to press Korea to clean up its political scene, given its notorious scandals over the years. Straying away for old-school politics, where generations voted based on where the candidate was from or from what political faction he was in, Ahn is presenting a new political paradigm.

5. Ahn’s stance on North Korea should not be equated to that of the current opposition party. Although he has not yet made it crystal clear, Ahn’s approach to the North does not seem to be as lenient. While his stance would probably be more warm-hearted than that of the current Lee administration, and based on two-way dialogue between the nations, one would expect Ahn to hold the North accountable on many more issues before blindly pouring aid into the country. If elected, Ahn’s interaction with the U.S. State Department regarding the North would be interesting to observe.

*     *     *

Korea is standing before major crossroads. The chosen path will indeed affect how Korea and U.S. will dine together for years to come.

Charisma has fueled modern civilization through much of the past centuries.

From the Caesars of the Roman Empire to Napoleon to Hitler, our leaders usually possessed and exhumed charismatic energy from their speech and actions. They spoke, and we listened. They bellowed “Follow me!”, and we followed. Crowds were drawn, and in turn, reacted to whatever was uttered from the worshiped mouths of the leader and his select few.

I call this the T-Rex leader. The T-Rex thrived on one-way communication. He ruled from on high, on the likes of Mount Olympus, and his input thundered downward to be engraved upon the minds of his minions at his feet. Thought was not required. Like lemmings strutting down meaningless paths, simple actions were valued, questions discouraged. The T-Rex knew it all and had it all, so why question? Surely, T-Rex would look out for the common good.

This T-Rex is now extinct.

As the twenty-first century welcomed in a new wave of information technology, the minions became empowered. Knowledge is no longer a delicacy of the few, tucked away in T-Rex’s castles and chests. Knowledge and information is now a shared commodity, openly traded, sometimes for value, sometimes for free. Knowledge has become power, the power to question, the power to observe. Today, the T-Rex may bellow and beckon a following. The empowered minions inquisitively observe the T-Rex and think, asking “Is this T-Rex worthy of a following?”

The T-Rex must upgrade itself, to T-Rex Squared.

One-way commands, downward in nature, are now void of value. Pyramid organizational structures are crumbling left and right. They are ineffective and wasteful at best. The new motto is “From Vertical to Horizontal”. T-Rex Squared understands the value of two-way communication. He is a leader that dwells amongst his peers, breathing the same oxygen at that sea level. He lives and breathes the organization, and his mind is saturated (in a good way) with the overflowing creative juices of his empowered minions, now companions.

T-Rex Squared builds a web of communication. Input comes and goes in all directions. T-Rex Squared knows his limits, both intellectually and physically. He acquires the expertise of former minions and encourages them to freely create. Professional fields, segregated and holed up in the past, merge to create synergistic new fields and values. Information is shared, and knowledge is maximized through cross-references and communication.

Perhaps most strikingly, T-Rex Squared need not bellow. He just acts. Others examine him critically, and if he is deemed worthy of a following, they follow. T-Rex Squared is the ultimate catalyst, drawing broad boundaries and fueling thought and creation with moral and financial support.

As we head into election season, we must sense this societal change. Needs have changed. Survival criteria have changed. The definition of value has changed. From this day forth, our leaders must change as well.

%d bloggers like this: